The Advertising Delivery State Ontology separates what an advertiser intends from whether the provider lets it serve, why delivery is held, and whether the advertising entity remains live.

This is an unofficial specification of version 0.1.0 of this Inferal ontology module. The vocabulary remains a draft.

Feedback should be sent to contact@inferal.com.

The key words MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, and MAY in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals.

RDF data conforms to the vocabulary when it uses the terms according to their normative meanings below. A data producer claiming closed-world conformance MUST also satisfy the SHACL graph distributed with this module. OWL and RDFS entailment do not imply that an omitted value is false.

Namespace

PrefixNamespace IRI
adelhttps://ontology.inferal.com/modules/advertising-delivery-state/

Scope

This module covers reified delivery states, advertiser intent, the serving state a provider reports, repeatable serving holds with their origins, lifecycle standing, and an optional interval over which a state is effective.

Advertising hierarchy tiers, budgets, metrics, provider policy taxonomies, and transition histories are outside this module. A hold may point to one of those resources without redefining it.

Competency Questions

  1. Which entities cannot serve, and why?
  2. Which entities are blocked by a resource other than themselves?
  3. Where does advertiser intent disagree with the reported serving state?
  4. Which holds can the advertiser act on, and which originate elsewhere?
  5. Which entities were switched off rather than archived or removed?
  6. Which holds can no shared hold kind route, whichever provider reported them?
  7. Which entities can serve now, including those serving in a limited capacity?

Conceptual Model

Independent state axes

Delivery intent is a configuration setting, serving state is what the provider reports about whether the entity may serve, and lifecycle standing records whether the entity still exists. A serving state does not say that impressions are delivered: delivery is measured by the Advertising Measurement module. Limited serving is narrower than serving, so a consumer asking which entities can serve follows skos:broader to adel:serving instead of comparing against it. Producers MUST state these axes separately instead of collapsing them into one status value.

First-class holds

A delivery state can have several simultaneous holds. Each hold names one kind and the resource where it originated, allowing a consumer to distinguish a local problem from an inherited account, campaign, or policy problem.

Observation over time

A delivery state describes an entity during an interval. A later state does not invalidate an earlier observation when their effective intervals differ.

Term Reference

Every term in this section is exported for cross-reference. Definitions state the term's meaning; the relations column summarizes declared RDFS and SKOS links. Closed-world cardinalities are specified separately in Validation.

Classes

TermKindNormative meaningRelations
adel:DeliveryIntent Class What the advertiser wants the entity to do: run, or not run. Intent is a setting, and it is independent of whether delivery actually occurs. Subclass of: skos:Concept
adel:DeliveryState Class The reported delivery situation of one advertising entity: what the advertiser intends, whether the provider lets it serve, the holds preventing it, and its lifecycle standing. Subclass of: prov:Entity
adel:HoldKind Class The category of a serving hold, such as a policy review outcome, a billing problem, an exhausted allowance, or an ancestor that is paused. Subclass of: skos:Concept
adel:LifecycleState Class Whether the entity is live, archived out of the working set, or deleted. Subclass of: skos:Concept
adel:ServingHold Class A first-class reason an entity is not serving despite the advertiser intending it to, naming the kind of hold and the resource it originated from. No local domain or range restriction.
adel:ServingState Class Whether the provider lets the entity serve, independent of what the advertiser intends. Whether impressions are delivered is measured by advertising-measurement, not stated by a serving state. Subclass of: skos:Concept

Properties

TermKindNormative meaningRelations
adel:effectiveDuring Property The interval a delivery state was observed to hold over. Open above when the state is current. Domain: adel:DeliveryState; Range: rng:Range
adel:heldBy Property A hold preventing delivery. A state may carry several, and an entity intending to run with no holds should be serving. Domain: adel:DeliveryState; Range: adel:ServingHold
adel:holdKind Property The category of the hold, which determines who can act on it. Domain: adel:ServingHold; Range: adel:HoldKind
adel:intendedDelivery Property What the advertiser wants the entity to do. Domain: adel:DeliveryState; Range: adel:DeliveryIntent
adel:lifecycleStanding Property Whether the entity is live, archived, or deleted. Domain: adel:DeliveryState; Range: adel:LifecycleState
adel:observedServing Property Whether the provider lets the entity serve. Domain: adel:DeliveryState; Range: adel:ServingState
adel:originatingResource Property The resource the hold came from. For an inherited hold this is the ancestor that is paused; for a hold arising from the entity itself it is that entity. Domain: adel:ServingHold; Range: rdfs:Resource
adel:stateOf Property The advertising entity this delivery state describes. Domain: adel:DeliveryState; Range: rdfs:Resource

Controlled concepts

TermKindNormative meaningRelations
adel:accountRestrictionHold Concept Delivery is prevented because the platform has restricted or suspended the advertiser account as a whole. The remedy lies with the account owner, through the platform's review or appeal process. Scheme: adel:HoldKindScheme
adel:allowanceExhaustedHold Concept Delivery is prevented because the governing budget or spend cap is spent. The remedy is a configuration change. Scheme: adel:HoldKindScheme
adel:ancestorHeldHold Concept Delivery is prevented by an ancestor that itself cannot serve. The originating resource names which ancestor, which is the part provider enumerations omit. Scheme: adel:HoldKindScheme
adel:archivedEntity Concept The entity is removed from the working set but retained. Its historical metrics remain valid and readable. Scheme: adel:LifecycleStateScheme
adel:billingHold Concept Delivery is prevented by the account's payment standing. The remedy lies with whoever owns the account, not with the entity. Scheme: adel:HoldKindScheme
adel:configurationHold Concept Delivery is prevented by the setup of the entity where the hold originates, which may be an ancestor of the held entity: a required setting, targeting or asset is missing or misconfigured, or the entities beneath it are missing or all switched off. The remedy is a change to that setup, which the advertiser makes. Scheme: adel:HoldKindScheme
adel:intendToHold Concept The advertiser has switched delivery off. Scheme: adel:DeliveryIntentScheme
adel:intendToRun Concept The advertiser wants the entity to deliver. Scheme: adel:DeliveryIntentScheme
adel:limitedServing Concept The entity is eligible to serve, but the provider reports that it serves only in part. Scheme: adel:ServingStateScheme; broader: adel:serving
adel:liveEntity Concept The entity exists in the advertiser's working set. Scheme: adel:LifecycleStateScheme
adel:notServing Concept The provider does not let the entity serve, for reasons its intent or its holds record. Scheme: adel:ServingStateScheme
adel:outsideScheduleHold Concept Delivery is prevented because the current time falls outside the entity's flight or dayparting. Nothing is wrong. Scheme: adel:HoldKindScheme
adel:policyReviewHold Concept Delivery is prevented pending or following a platform policy decision. The advertiser's remedy is to amend the entity or appeal. Scheme: adel:HoldKindScheme
adel:processingHold Concept Delivery is prevented while the platform finishes work on a recent change. Transient and requiring no action. Scheme: adel:HoldKindScheme
adel:removedEntity Concept The entity no longer exists. Historical metrics may survive it, and a query joining to the entity will not resolve. Scheme: adel:LifecycleStateScheme
adel:serving Concept Nothing the provider reports prevents the entity from serving. Scheme: adel:ServingStateScheme
adel:unclassifiedHold Concept Delivery is prevented for a reason the provider does not name, or names in terms no other hold kind covers. Who can act is unknown until the provider's own reason is read. Provider profiles place their unmapped hold kinds under this one, so a single query finds them across providers. Scheme: adel:HoldKindScheme

Concept schemes

TermKindNormative meaningRelations
adel:DeliveryIntentScheme Concept scheme Controlled vocabulary of what an advertiser intends an entity to do. No local domain or range restriction.
adel:HoldKindScheme Concept scheme Controlled vocabulary of reasons delivery is prevented. No local domain or range restriction.
adel:LifecycleStateScheme Concept scheme Controlled vocabulary of whether an entity still exists. No local domain or range restriction.
adel:ServingStateScheme Concept scheme Controlled vocabulary of whether the provider lets an entity serve. No local domain or range restriction.

Validation

The module's SHACL constraints provide the closed-world conformance profile. The following requirements summarize the constraints that affect ordinary data producers.

Examples

Extension and Interoperability

Controlled vocabularies use SKOS so provider profiles MAY add narrower or matched concepts without replacing the shared classes. Extensions MUST preserve the meanings and constraints of terms they reuse. A mapping MUST NOT assert equivalence merely because two provider fields have similar labels. A profile hold kind SHOULD be narrower than exactly one shared hold kind, and a hold kind the profile cannot classify is narrower than adel:unclassifiedHold.

Privacy and Security Considerations

Hold reasons can disclose billing problems, policy decisions, or operational outages. Publishers SHOULD limit access where those facts are sensitive. The vocabulary records state and provenance but does not authorize remediation actions.